![]() ![]() With an aggregate economic impact of $72 billion, the F-35 program is a boon to aerospace suppliers.aerospace industry in this turbulent period. There are four reasons the F-35 will underpin the U.S. These activities in turn spur $38 billion of indirect economic activity, the money that flows out into the broader nonaerospace economy. This includes money spent on internal manufacturing and final assembly activities as well as direct spending with multiple tiers of suppliers and a broad range of sustainment activities. economy is approximately $34 billion annually. AeroDynamic Advisory, in a study commissioned by Lockheed Martin, estimates that the direct economic impact of the F-35 program on the U.S. The answer may not lie not on the commercial side but rather on the defense side, specifically with the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. With the aerospace giant seemingly in pause mode, is it fair to ask what other programs will play a crucial role in helping the United States maintain its position as the world aerospace leader. Additionally, Boeing has continued to report multibillion-dollar losses on its defense programs such as the KC-46 tanker, VC-25B presidential transport, MQ-25 uncrewed aerial refueler and T-7A trainer. This news came as Boeing, formerly the world’s largest aerospace company, is awaiting FAA certification of its 737 MAX 7 and MAX 10, and many are wondering if those certifications will happen at all. Late last year, Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun publicly stated that a new clean-sheet aircraft would not be released this decade. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |